The Perils of Duplication and Speed in Senior Executive Search: Avoiding Compromised Quality and CV Bun Fights.

The team at Emerald Zebra recommend strategies for balancing multiple recruitment agencies in a small Market with the lead time approach.

Introduction

Recruiting senior executives in a small market such as Cyprus can be a daunting task. Many companies opt to engage multiple recruitment agencies to increase the chances of finding the right candidate. However, this approach has its benefits and drawbacks. In this article we explore the challenges companies face when engaging multiple recruitment agencies for senior executive search in a small market. We discuss the potential drawbacks of this approach, including duplication of effort, compromised quality due to speed, and a potential negative impact on the company’s reputation. We also highlight the cost and time effectiveness of engaging one recruitment agency exclusively, negotiating favorable terms and avoiding unnecessary expenses.

Duplicating efforts: Engaging multiple recruitment agencies for the same senior executive search can result in duplicated efforts. This can happen when different agencies are not aware that the other is also working on the same search, and they end up conducting the same candidate search, leading to redundancy in the recruitment process. This duplication of efforts can result in wasted time and resources, ultimately delaying the recruitment process.

Compromising quality due to speed: When multiple agencies are involved in the same search, there can be pressure to present candidates quickly, which can compromise the quality of the search. The agencies may prioritise speed over quality, resulting in lower-quality candidates being presented to the client. This can result in the client having to spend more time and resources on the recruitment process.

Engaging multiple agencies for senior executive search in a small market can be like throwing spaghetti at a wall and seeing what sticks. It’s a recipe for duplication of effort and ultimately, wasted time and resources. – HR Director.

Throwing any CV to see if it will stick: When there is a high level of competition between recruitment agencies for the same search, there can be a temptation to present any candidate that meets the minimum requirements, regardless of their suitability for the role. This can lead to a flood of CVs being sent to the client, many of which are not a good fit for the role. Sorting through all of these CVs can be time-consuming and frustrating for the client.

Bun fight and race to get CVs to the client: When multiple agencies are involved in the same search, there can be a race to get CVs to the client first. This can result in a “bun fight” between the agencies, with each trying to outdo the others in terms of the number of CVs sent to the client. This can be overwhelming for the client, who may have to spend more time reviewing CVs and conducting interviews than they would if they worked with just one agency.

Cost-effectiveness: By working with one recruitment agency exclusively, the client can negotiate favorable terms and avoid unnecessary expenses, ultimately resulting in a more cost and time effective recruitment process.

When it comes to engaging multiple recruitment agencies, companies need to be mindful of their reputation in the eyes of potential candidates. Working with too many agencies can make the company appear desperate and unprofessional. – Executive Search Expert.

Reputation: When multiple recruitment agencies are involved in the same senior executive search, it can create the impression that the company is desperate to fill the position. This can negatively impact the company’s reputation and make it less attractive to top talent.

When candidates are contacted by multiple recruiters about the same job opportunity, it can be overwhelming and create confusion. It may also create the impression that the company is not organised and lacks a clear recruitment strategy. This can make it more challenging for the company to attract and retain top talent, as candidates may be hesitant to join an organisation amongst the confusion created.

To mitigate this risk, companies can work with a limited number of reputable recruitment agencies and communicate openly with the candidates about the recruitment process. They can also be transparent about their reasons for using multiple recruitment agencies and how they will be working with them to fill the position. By being transparent and clear about their recruitment strategy, companies can help to maintain their reputation and attract the best talent.

Balancing multiple recruitment agencies in a small market can be challenging, but with careful planning and communication, it’s possible to create a collaborative and effective approach that delivers results. – HR Manager.

Our Recommendations:

A possible solution to balance the multiple recruitment agencies approach is the lead time approach where one agency has a certain number of days ahead of the other agency to conduct the search. Another option is to employ a retained search approach with one agency, providing access to a more extensive pool of quality candidates and a more tailored experience. The lead time approach can help businesses balance the benefits of multiple recruitment agencies while avoiding duplication and competition between agencies. Additionally, introducing retained search can provide a more personalised approach and access to a larger pool of quality candidates. However, it’s crucial to establish clear communication with recruitment agencies. Communication and planning are key in creating a collaborative and effective approach.

Conclusion:

Finding the right approach to senior executive search in a small market requires balancing speed, cost-effectiveness, quality, and reputation. Working with multiple recruitment agencies can be challenging, but with the lead time approach and careful planning, businesses can achieve a collaborative and effective search. Ultimately, companies need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and choose the one that aligns with their goals and values.

About Us

Our bespoke executive search service is personally led by Emerald Zebra’s founder, Donna Stephenson. Donna’s network of connections reaches from Cyprus globally and with 21 year’s extensive experience in executive recruitment.

The team at Emerald Zebra has the expertise and resources to assist you to find the right executive for your business with the highest level of discretion.

For more information please contact Donna Stephenson at donna.stephenson@emeraldzebra.cy

Published by

Emerald Zebra - FinTech, Tech & Finance Sector Jobs in Cyprus

Emerald Zebra – FinTech, Tech & Finance Sector Jobs in Cyprus

In our article we explore the challenges companies face when engaging multiple recruitment agencies for senior executive search in a small market such as hashtag#Cyprus. We discuss the potential drawbacks of this approach, including duplication of effort, compromised quality due to speed, and a potential negative impact on the company’s reputation. We also highlight the cost and time effectiveness of engaging one recruitment agency exclusively, negotiating favorable terms and avoiding unnecessary expenses. In conclusion, we suggest a lead time approach where one agency has a certain number of days ahead of the other agency to conduct the search. Additionally, we explore the benefits of introducing a retained search approach, including access to a larger pool of high-quality candidates and a more personalised approach. Emerald Zebra – FinTech, Tech & Finance Sector Jobs in Cyprus jobs@emeraldzebra.cy hashtag#recruitment hashtag#quality hashtag#executivesearch hashtag#welovewhatwedo

Related News